barrettruth/cp.nvim
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Packages Activity Actions

ci: fix LuaRocks runtime publishing #389

Merged
barrettruth merged 1 commit from ci/fix-luarocks-runtime into main 2026-05-03 17:53:31 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files changed 4 +122 -73
barrettruth commented 2026-05-03 17:53:16 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Problem

The Forgejo LuaRocks runtime check exposed two issues: the stable workflow tried to run an upstream flake package that only exists for x86_64-linux, while the runners are aarch64-linux; and nightly upload verification could fail even after upload when the global dev manifest lagged the uploader manifest.

Solution

Replace the stable release action with a local Forgejo-compatible LuaRocks publish script, keep the rendered context as deploy / LuaRocks, and make nightly verification accept either the global dev manifest or the barrettruth uploader manifest.

Problem The Forgejo LuaRocks runtime check exposed two issues: the stable workflow tried to run an upstream flake package that only exists for x86_64-linux, while the runners are aarch64-linux; and nightly upload verification could fail even after upload when the global dev manifest lagged the uploader manifest. Solution Replace the stable release action with a local Forgejo-compatible LuaRocks publish script, keep the rendered context as deploy / LuaRocks, and make nightly verification accept either the global dev manifest or the barrettruth uploader manifest.
ci: fix LuaRocks runtime publishing
All checks were successful
quality / Lint (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Details
quality / Test (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
quality / Format (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
1977a09dc4
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
bug
Something isn't working

  
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement
New feature or request

  
good first issue
Good for newcomers

  
help wanted
Extra attention is needed

  
invalid
This doesn't seem right

  
question
Further information is requested

  
wontfix
This will not be worked on

No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
barrettruth/cp.nvim!389
No description provided.