feat(presets/tectonic): audit and validate failure summary coverage #90

Closed
opened 2026-04-26 00:12:28 +00:00 by barrettruth · 1 comment
barrettruth commented 2026-04-26 00:12:28 +00:00

Follow-up to #81 and #70.

Scope

Audit the tectonic preset and implement a trustworthy short failure summary using the merged failure_summary(result, ctx) hook from #86.

Why this needs its own issue

tectonic has its own compiler output shape and failure modes. We should not mark #81 done until this preset has explicit positive and negative coverage with both automated tests and manual validation.

Acceptance criteria

  • Positive path: a representative valid tectonic document compiles successfully, no failure summary is shown, and stale diagnostics/quickfix clear after success.
  • Primary negative path: the canonical tectonic failure produces the intended one-line summary, and the exact summary string is asserted in automated tests.
  • Noisy negative path: boilerplate, wrapped output, repeated errors, or surrounding CLI noise still yield the right summary instead of truncated or misleading text.
  • Fallback path: when no trustworthy tectonic summary is available, behavior falls back cleanly to the generic failure or :Preview output hint path; never empty, never misleading.
  • Raw output remains available through :Preview output and preview.result().
  • Automated coverage lands in repo specs/fixtures for both success and failure behavior.
  • Manual validation is run in nix develop .#presets against the real toolchain, and the validated output shapes are recorded in the PR.

Representative cases to cover

  • missing package or missing input errors surfaced by Tectonic
  • file-line errors such as Missing $ inserted.
  • generic trailing noise such as halted on potentially-recoverable error as specified must not replace a better earlier message
Follow-up to #81 and #70. ## Scope Audit the `tectonic` preset and implement a trustworthy short failure summary using the merged `failure_summary(result, ctx)` hook from #86. ## Why this needs its own issue `tectonic` has its own compiler output shape and failure modes. We should not mark #81 done until this preset has explicit positive and negative coverage with both automated tests and manual validation. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] Positive path: a representative valid `tectonic` document compiles successfully, no failure summary is shown, and stale diagnostics/quickfix clear after success. - [ ] Primary negative path: the canonical `tectonic` failure produces the intended one-line summary, and the exact summary string is asserted in automated tests. - [ ] Noisy negative path: boilerplate, wrapped output, repeated errors, or surrounding CLI noise still yield the right summary instead of truncated or misleading text. - [ ] Fallback path: when no trustworthy `tectonic` summary is available, behavior falls back cleanly to the generic failure or `:Preview output` hint path; never empty, never misleading. - [ ] Raw output remains available through `:Preview output` and `preview.result()`. - [ ] Automated coverage lands in repo specs/fixtures for both success and failure behavior. - [ ] Manual validation is run in `nix develop .#presets` against the real toolchain, and the validated output shapes are recorded in the PR. ## Representative cases to cover - missing package or missing input errors surfaced by Tectonic - file-line errors such as `Missing $ inserted.` - generic trailing noise such as `halted on potentially-recoverable error as specified` must not replace a better earlier message
barrettruth commented 2026-04-26 02:08:09 +00:00

Implemented in #100.

Implemented in #100.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
barrettruth/preview.nvim#90
No description provided.