Make picker backend requirements explicit, or make them real options #173

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-04-12 17:22:09 +00:00 by barrettruth · 0 comments

barrettruth commented

2026-04-12 17:22:09 +00:00

Problem

Right now fzf-lua is effectively required.

The code only knows one picker backend, healthcheck errors without it, and the docs/readme treat it as a requirement.

Expected

Pick one direction and make it consistent:

either fzf-lua stays required and we say that plainly, or
picker backends become genuinely optional/pluggable and the docs, healthcheck, and architecture all reflect that.

## Problem Right now `fzf-lua` is effectively required. The code only knows one picker backend, healthcheck errors without it, and the docs/readme treat it as a requirement. ## Expected Pick one direction and make it consistent: - either `fzf-lua` stays required and we say that plainly, or - picker backends become genuinely optional/pluggable and the docs, healthcheck, and architecture all reflect that.