Revisit delete confirmation UX for picker actions #171

Closed
opened 2026-04-12 17:22:07 +00:00 by barrettruth · 2 comments
barrettruth commented 2026-04-12 17:22:07 +00:00

Problem

Delete confirmations for branch/worktree actions currently use a numbered choice prompt.

That works, but it feels clunky compared to an inline [y/N] prompt.

Expected

  • a simpler inline confirmation style
  • an option to skip delete confirmations entirely for users who want faster picker workflows
## Problem Delete confirmations for branch/worktree actions currently use a numbered choice prompt. That works, but it feels clunky compared to an inline `[y/N]` prompt. ## Expected - a simpler inline confirmation style - an option to skip delete confirmations entirely for users who want faster picker workflows
barrettruth commented 2026-04-12 20:28:13 +00:00

Closing as done: branch/worktree delete confirmations already use inline [y/N] prompts, and / already allow skipping confirmations entirely. The current docs and specs also cover this behavior.

Closing as done: branch/worktree delete confirmations already use inline [y/N] prompts, and / already allow skipping confirmations entirely. The current docs and specs also cover this behavior.
barrettruth commented 2026-04-12 20:28:22 +00:00

Closing as done: branch/worktree delete confirmations already use inline [y/N] prompts, and confirm.branch_delete / confirm.worktree_delete already allow skipping confirmations entirely. The current docs and specs also cover this behavior.

Closing as done: branch/worktree delete confirmations already use inline `[y/N]` prompts, and `confirm.branch_delete` / `confirm.worktree_delete` already allow skipping confirmations entirely. The current docs and specs also cover this behavior.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
barrettruth/forge.nvim#171
No description provided.