Clean up CI and checks picker behavior #169

Closed
opened 2026-04-12 17:22:06 +00:00 by barrettruth · 1 comment
barrettruth commented 2026-04-12 17:22:06 +00:00

Problem

The CI/check surface works, but it still has a pile of regressions and rough edges.

Observed:

  • :FzfLua resume duplicated check rows on each resume
  • long check names get truncated too aggressively
  • duration extmarks are hard to distinguish from real log text
  • the repo CI summary view feels questionable overall
  • repo CI likely needs a load more path
  • repo CI may want grouping by workflow/run type
  • current highlight treatment in summary/log views is not great

Expected

The CI surface should feel stable, readable, and obvious.

## Problem The CI/check surface works, but it still has a pile of regressions and rough edges. Observed: - `:FzfLua resume` duplicated check rows on each resume - long check names get truncated too aggressively - duration extmarks are hard to distinguish from real log text - the repo CI summary view feels questionable overall - repo CI likely needs a `load more` path - repo CI may want grouping by workflow/run type - current highlight treatment in summary/log views is not great ## Expected The CI surface should feel stable, readable, and obvious.
barrettruth commented 2026-04-12 22:26:27 +00:00

Addressed by #206.

Addressed by #206.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
barrettruth/forge.nvim#169
No description provided.