Problem: `line_hl_group` bg unconditionally overrides `hl_group` bg
regardless of priority (neovim/neovim#31151). `DiffsAddText`/
`DiffsDeleteText` at p201 were invisible under `DiffsAdd`/`DiffsDelete`
`line_hl_group` at p200 because they operate on separate stacking layers.
Solution: replace `line_hl_group` with `hl_group` + `hl_eol` +
`end_col` for line backgrounds, putting them on the same layer as
intra-line highlights so priority governs stacking. Use single-row
extmarks (`end_row = buf_line`) to avoid the adjacent-hunk clearing
bug. Split `number_hl_group` into a separate extmark. Use raw
`DiffAdd.bg`/`DiffDelete.bg` for `DiffsAddText`/`DiffsDeleteText`
instead of alpha-blending toward Normal.bg, which produced
indistinguishable colors on dark themes.
## Problem
`highlight_hunk` applied DiffsClear extmarks across 5 scattered sites
with
ad-hoc column arithmetic. This fragmentation produced the 1-column
DiffsClear
gap on email-quoted body context lines (#142 issue 1). A redundant
`highlight_hunk_vim_syntax` function duplicated the inline vim syntax
path,
and the deferred pass in init.lua double-called it, creating duplicate
scratch
buffers and extmarks.
## Solution
Reorganize `highlight_hunk` into two clean phases:
- **Phase 1** — multi-line syntax computation (treesitter, vim syntax,
diff
grammar, header context text). Sets syntax extmarks only, no DiffsClear.
- **Phase 2** — per-line chrome (DiffsClear, backgrounds, gutter,
overlays,
intra-line). All non-syntax extmarks consolidated in one pass.
Hoist `new_code` to function scope (needed by `highlight_text` outside
the
`use_ts` block). Hoist `at_raw_line` so Phase 1d and Phase 2b share one
`nvim_buf_get_lines` call.
Delete `highlight_hunk_vim_syntax` (redundant with inline path). Remove
the
double-call from the deferred pass in init.lua.
Extend body prefix DiffsClear `end_col` from `qw` to `pw + qw`, fixing
the
1-column gap where native treesitter background bled through on context
lines
in email-quoted diffs (#142 issue 1).
### Email-quoted diff support
The parser now strips `> ` (and `>> `, etc.) email quote prefixes before
pattern matching, enabling syntax highlighting for diffs embedded in
email
replies and `git-send-email` / sourcehut-style patch review threads.
Each hunk stores `quote_width` so the highlight pipeline can apply
`DiffsClear` at the correct column offsets to suppress native treesitter
on quoted regions.
Closes#141
### #142 status after this PR
| Sub-issue | Status |
|-----------|--------|
| 1. Col gap on context lines | Fixed |
| 2. Bare `>` context lines | Improved, edge case remains |
| 3. Diff prefix marker fg | Not addressed (follow-up) |
## Problem
Regressions #119 and #120 showed the test suite had no coverage of the
decoration provider cache pipeline, no end-to-end pipeline tests from
buffer content to extmarks, and no Neogit-specific integration tests.
## Solution
Adds three new spec files (28 new tests, 316 total):
- `spec/decoration_provider_spec.lua` — indirect cache pipeline tests
via `_test` table: `ensure_cache` population, content fingerprint guard,
`pending_clear` semantics, BufWipeout cleanup
- `spec/integration_spec.lua` — full pipeline: diff buffer → `attach` →
extmarks; verifies `DiffsAdd`/`DiffsDelete` on correct lines, treesitter
captures, multi-hunk coverage
- `spec/neogit_integration_spec.lua` — `neogit_disable_hunk_highlight`
behavior, NeogitStatus/NeogitDiffView attach and cache population,
parser neogit filename patterns
Depends on #133.
Closes#122
