diff --git a/posts/economics/models-of-production.html b/posts/economics/models-of-production.html
index e446957..3bbc1ea 100644
--- a/posts/economics/models-of-production.html
+++ b/posts/economics/models-of-production.html
@@ -211,50 +211,61 @@
               \bar{A}^\frac{1}{1-\alpha}(\frac{\bar{s}}{\bar{d}})^\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha})\]
             </p>
           </div>
-          <div class="fold"><h3>analysis</h3></div>
-          <p>
-            Using both mathematical intuition and manipulating the visualization
-            above, we find that:
-          </p>
-          <ul style="list-style: unset">
-            <li>
-              \(\bar{A}\) has a positive relationship with steady-state output
-            </li>
-            <li>
-              Capital is influenced by workforce size, TFP, and savings rate
-            </li>
-            <li>
-              Capital output share's \(\alpha\) impact on output is twofold:
-              <ol>
-                <li>Directly through capital quantity</li>
-                <li>Indirectly through TFP</li>
-              </ol>
-            </li>
-            <li>
-              Large deviations in capital from steady-state \(K^*\) induce net
-              investments of larger magnitude, leading to an accelerated
-              reversion to the steady-state
-            </li>
-          </ul>
-          <p>
-            Lastly (and perhaps most importantly), exogenous parameters
-            \(\bar{s}, \bar{d}\), and \(\bar{A}\) all have immense ramifications
-            on economic status. For example, comparing the difference in country
-            \(C_1\)&apos;s output versus \(C_2\)&apos;s using the Solow Model,
-            we find that a difference in economic performance can only be
-            explained by these factors: \[
-            \frac{Y_1}{Y_2}=\frac{\bar{A_1}}{\bar{A_2}}(\frac{\bar{s_1}}{\bar{s_2}})^\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha}
-            \]
-          </p>
-          <p>
-            We see that TFP is more important in explaining the differences in
-            per capital output
-            (\(\frac{1}{1-\alpha}>\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha},\alpha\in[0,1)\)).
-            However, the Solow Model does not give any insight in to how to
-            alter what it considers to be the most important predictor of
-            output.
-          </p>
+          <div class="fold">
+            <h3>analysis</h3>
+          </div>
+          <div>
+            <p>
+              Using both mathematical intuition and manipulating the
+              visualization above, we find that:
+            </p>
+            <ul style="list-style: unset">
+              <li>
+                \(\bar{A}\) has a positive relationship with steady-state output
+              </li>
+              <li>
+                Capital is influenced by workforce size, TFP, and savings rate
+              </li>
+              <li>
+                Capital output share's \(\alpha\) impact on output is twofold:
+                <ol>
+                  <li>Directly through capital quantity</li>
+                  <li>Indirectly through TFP</li>
+                </ol>
+              </li>
+              <li>
+                Large deviations in capital from steady-state \(K^*\) induce net
+                investments of larger magnitude, leading to an accelerated
+                reversion to the steady-state
+              </li>
+              <li>
+                Economies stagnate at the steady-state \((K^*,Y^*)\)&mdash;this
+                model provides no avenues for long-run growth.
+              </li>
+            </ul>
+            <p>
+              Lastly (and perhaps most importantly), exogenous parameters
+              \(\bar{s}, \bar{d}\), and \(\bar{A}\) all have immense
+              ramifications on economic status. For example, comparing the
+              difference in country \(C_1\)&apos;s output versus \(C_2\)&apos;s
+              using the Solow Model, we find that a difference in economic
+              performance can only be explained by these factors: \[
+              \frac{Y_1}{Y_2}=\frac{\bar{A_1}}{\bar{A_2}}(\frac{\bar{s_1}}{\bar{s_2}})^\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha}
+              \]
+            </p>
+            <p>
+              We see that TFP is more important in explaining the differences in
+              per capital output
+              (\(\frac{1}{1-\alpha}>\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha},\alpha\in[0,1)\)).
+              <!-- TODO: poor phrasing -->
+              Notably, the Solow Model does not give any insights into how to
+              alter the most important predictor of output, TFP.
+            </p>
+          </div>
           <h2>romer</h2>
+          <!-- TODO: transition talking about "Romer model does, though" -->
+          <!-- TODO: say the romer model provides avenue for LR growth -->
+          <!-- TODO: dynamics?????? -->
           <h2>romer-solow</h2>
         </article>
       </div>