From 07e4afc62bafb61512fc1a68e2f8a18059a374cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Barrett Ruth <br.barrettruth@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:08:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fix(post): another typo

---
 posts/algorithms/leetcode-daily.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/posts/algorithms/leetcode-daily.html b/posts/algorithms/leetcode-daily.html
index 0a571a5..6c70b00 100644
--- a/posts/algorithms/leetcode-daily.html
+++ b/posts/algorithms/leetcode-daily.html
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
                 because \(log_2(x)\) is not available in python.
               </li>
               <li>
-                It&apos;s certainly possible that \(max(nums, k)=0\). To avoid
+                It&apos;s certainly possible that \(max\{nums, k\}=0\). To avoid
                 the invalid calculation \(log(0)\), take the larger of \(1\) and
                 this calculation. The number of digits will then (correctly) be
                 \(1\) in this special case.